PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. SPXV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. SPXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSPU having a 8.91% return and SPXV slightly higher at 9.08%. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has underperformed SPXV with an annualized return of 9.73%, while SPXV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.


RSPU

1D
0.98%
1M
0.63%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.36%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
9.73%

SPXV

1D
-1.52%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
9.08%
6M
8.22%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. SPXV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
8.91%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
9.08%18.40%28.02%30.71%-20.47%28.37%18.99%33.58%-3.81%17.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and SPXV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.30

The correlation between RSPU and SPXV shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPU vs. SPXV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
SPXV

Utilities

99.6%
2.3%

Financial Services

0.4%
12.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

42.6%

Utilities

RSPU
99.6%
SPXV
2.3%

Financial Services

RSPU
0.4%
SPXV
12.1%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

SPXV
1.8%

Communication Services

RSPU

-

SPXV
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

SPXV
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

SPXV
4.9%

Energy

RSPU

-

SPXV
3.4%

Healthcare

RSPU

-

SPXV

-

Industrials

RSPU

-

SPXV
8.5%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

SPXV
2.0%

Technology

RSPU

-

SPXV
42.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. SPXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXV
SPXV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. SPXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPUSPXVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.68

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

11.27

-6.91

RSPU vs. SPXV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SPXV Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and SPXV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. SPXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than SPXV's maximum drawdown of -34.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and SPXV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUSPXVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-34.34%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-9.15%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-19.89%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-26.58%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-34.34%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-3.66%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-4.51%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.17%

+1.65%

Volatility

RSPU vs. SPXV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) have volatilities of 4.98% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUSPXVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

5.00%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

10.54%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

13.34%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.88%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.08%

+1.04%

RSPU vs. SPXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. SPXV - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than SPXV's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.52%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
0.92%0.97%1.12%1.27%1.67%1.11%1.45%1.58%1.89%1.57%2.66%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and SPXV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to RSPU (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs SPXV's -34.34%.

On 10-year performance, SPXV leads with 16.03% vs 9.73% for RSPU. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.92% for SPXV.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPXV is S&P 500. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.09% for SPXV.

SPXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and SPXV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer