RSPU vs. SPUS
RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPU returned 10.73%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for SPUS. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
RSPU vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 16.82% return.
RSPU
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
SPUS
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 16.82%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- 25.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPU vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 5.10% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 4.37% | 17.13% | -2.70% | 0.87% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 16.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPU and SPUS is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSPU and SPUS has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSPU vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPU
SPUS
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
RSPU
SPUS
Basic Materials
RSPU
-
SPUS
Communication Services
RSPU
-
SPUS
Consumer Cyclical
RSPU
-
SPUS
Consumer Defensive
RSPU
-
SPUS
Energy
RSPU
-
SPUS
Financial Services
RSPU
-
SPUS
-
Healthcare
RSPU
-
SPUS
Industrials
RSPU
-
SPUS
Real Estate
RSPU
-
SPUS
Technology
RSPU
-
SPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPU vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
RSPU
SPUS
RSPU vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPU | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 3.00 | -2.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 3.96 | -2.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.52 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 4.04 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 17.44 | -14.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPU | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 3.00 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.94 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.92 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
RSPU vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPU | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -30.80% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -10.66% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -22.82% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -28.06% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | 0.00% | -6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -6.21% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.47% | +1.13% |
Volatility
RSPU vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 3.86%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPU | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.86% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 10.80% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 14.13% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 19.23% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 21.29% | -2.20% |
RSPU vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPU vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SPUS's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.53% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPU and SPUS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SPUS (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.97% vs 10.73% for RSPU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.51% for SPUS.
RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPU and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer