RSPT vs. UMI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. RSPT is passively managed, while UMI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPT returned 17.73%/yr vs 19.88%/yr for UMI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.

Performance

RSPT vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 38.00% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 24.00% return.

RSPT

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 6.83%
• YTD: 38.00%
• 6M: 36.68%
• 1Y: 63.04%
• 3Y*: 29.59%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: 21.84%

UMI

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 24.00%
• 6M: 23.82%
• 1Y: 25.24%
• 3Y*: 27.76%
• 5Y*: 19.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	38.00%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	0.40%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	24.00%	5.11%	42.97%	14.60%	20.78%	20.97%	-8.25%	21.06%	-10.64%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and UMI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017	0.37

The correlation between RSPT and UMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPT vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPT	UMI
Technology	97.4%	-
Energy	1.5%	99.0%
Industrials	1.1%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 87
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 64
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 59
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPT	UMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	1.83	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.53	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	3.43	+1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.68	9.22	+9.46

RSPT vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and UMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	UMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-48.08%	-10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.47%	-7.50%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	-17.08%	-9.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-20.05%	-12.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-3.61%	-3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-6.59%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	2.79%	+0.45%

Volatility

RSPT vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 5.61%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	UMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.32%	5.61%	+5.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.35%	11.01%	+8.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.22%	14.09%	+9.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.38%	19.54%	+4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.92%	23.17%	+0.75%

RSPT vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than UMI's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.27%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	5.91%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and UMI in my portfolio?

RSPT and UMI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or UMI?

RSPT has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to UMI (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs UMI's -48.08%.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or UMI?

On 5-year performance, UMI leads with 19.88% vs 17.73% for RSPT. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, UMI has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPT or UMI?

Over the 5-year period, UMI has performed better with a 19.88% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or UMI?

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or UMI?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between RSPT and UMI?

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.85% for UMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.