PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 22.48%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.12% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
-0.76%
1M
22.88%
YTD
47.30%
6M
46.37%
1Y
75.62%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
22.48%

AAPL

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
30.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
47.30%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.34%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and AAPL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPT and AAPL has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPTAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.43

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.12

3.88

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.76

9.76

+16.00

RSPT vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPTAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

2.40

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.75

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

1.05

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.44

+0.21

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-81.80%

+22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-13.80%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-33.36%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-33.36%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-38.52%

+4.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.57%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-29.61%

+20.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

5.47%

-2.52%

Volatility

RSPT vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

5.46%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

15.91%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

22.32%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

27.46%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

28.89%

-5.12%

Dividends

RSPT vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.25%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPT and AAPL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer