RSPS vs. SOXQ
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPS returned 1.88%/yr vs 31.46%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 74.43% return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- -0.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- -7.72%
- 6M
- 61.03%
- YTD
- 74.43%
- 1Y
- 117.47%
- 3Y*
- 49.64%
- 5Y*
- 31.46%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.18% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 5.09% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 74.43% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and SOXQ is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between RSPS and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
RSPS
SOXQ
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Industrials
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Technology
RSPS
-
SOXQ
Utilities
RSPS
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
SOXQ
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.43 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 7.42 | -7.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 23.55 | -22.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -46.01% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -15.92% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -39.36% | +22.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -46.01% | +27.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -15.65% | +9.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -12.84% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 5.01% | +1.61% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 5.52%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 21.73%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 21.73% | -16.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 35.36% | -24.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 41.31% | -26.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 37.85% | -24.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 37.61% | -22.67% |
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than SOXQ's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.90% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.29% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and SOXQ have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (21.73%) compared to RSPS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 31.46% vs 1.88% for RSPS. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 31.46% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.29% for SOXQ.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer