RSPS vs. CRAK
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.67%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CRAK. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.
Performance
RSPS vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 29.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 4.67%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 29.26%
- 6M
- 26.17%
- 1Y
- 55.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
RSPS vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.30% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 29.26% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and CRAK is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | 0.32 |
The correlation between RSPS and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPS vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
CRAK
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
CRAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
CRAK
-
Financial Services
RSPS
CRAK
-
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
CRAK
Communication Services
RSPS
-
CRAK
-
Energy
RSPS
-
CRAK
Healthcare
RSPS
-
CRAK
-
Industrials
RSPS
-
CRAK
Real Estate
RSPS
-
CRAK
-
Technology
RSPS
-
CRAK
-
Utilities
RSPS
-
CRAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
CRAK
RSPS vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.50 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 6.49 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 17.24 | -16.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and CRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -58.80% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -8.57% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -35.61% | +19.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -35.61% | +17.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -58.80% | +33.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -6.68% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -12.48% | +7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 3.22% | +3.07% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 4.33%, while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 5.81% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 14.72% | -4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 18.66% | -4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 20.67% | -7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 22.17% | -7.28% |
RSPS vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than CRAK's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.56% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and CRAK have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRAK has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to RSPS (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs CRAK's -58.80%.
On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.50% vs 4.67% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.56% for CRAK.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while CRAK is Energy Equities. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.62% for CRAK.
CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and CRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer