RSPR vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPR returned 6.22%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for XLG. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

RSPR vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 6.22%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.

RSPR

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 8.88%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

XLG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 8.82%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 30.80%
• 3Y*: 24.94%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	7.82%	-1.88%	8.61%	11.59%	-25.16%	49.61%	-2.90%	24.62%	-4.11%	8.76%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.82%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and XLG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPR and XLG has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPR vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPR	XLG
Real Estate	96.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	9.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	2.7%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Technology	-	43.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPR vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR

RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 15
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 62
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPR	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	2.33	-1.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	3.14	-2.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.41	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.55	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	9.60	-8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPR vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPR	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	2.33	-1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.90	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.93	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.63	-0.33

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPR	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.96%	-52.39%	+10.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-12.41%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.78%	-20.70%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.03%	-28.02%	-5.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.96%	-30.46%	-11.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-0.29%	-3.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-7.64%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	3.30%	+0.64%

Volatility

RSPR vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 2.92%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPR	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	2.92%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	9.73%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	13.28%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	18.68%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.37%	18.84%	+2.53%

RSPR vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPR vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than XLG's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	2.68%	2.70%	2.58%	2.91%	3.14%	2.56%	3.82%	2.48%	3.02%	3.01%	2.06%	1.03%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.59%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPR and XLG in my portfolio?

RSPR and XLG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPR or XLG?

RSPR has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to XLG (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, RSPR or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.41% vs 6.22% for RSPR. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPR or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPR or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPR or XLG?

RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.59% for XLG.

What is the main difference between RSPR and XLG?

RSPR is categorized as REIT, while XLG is S&P 500. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.