RSPG vs. GXPE
RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RSPG tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
RSPG vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly higher than GXPE's 29.05% return.
RSPG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 28.95%
- 1Y
- 47.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
GXPE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 29.05%
- 6M
- 29.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 34.27% | 6.19% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 29.05% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and GXPE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPG vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
RSPG
GXPE
RSPG vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPG | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPG | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 2.06 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPG | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.98% | -12.37% | -67.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -8.39% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -3.19% | -22.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPG vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPG | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 20.41% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 20.41% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 20.41% | +13.16% |
RSPG vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPG vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than GXPE's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.93% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.94% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, RSPG and GXPE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.93% for GXPE.
RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for RSPG and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer