RSPF vs. TRUF
RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. RSPF is passively managed, while TRUF is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RSPF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
RSPF vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RSPF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.52M | $1.88M | $1.39M | |
| $20.82K | $18.81K | $11.26K |
RSPF vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | 17.21% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 16.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPF and TRUF is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPF vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
RSPF
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPF vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPF vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.32% | -3.24% | -78.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -1.04% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -1.05% | -17.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPF vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 13.53% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 13.53% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 13.53% | +9.32% |
RSPF vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPF vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | 1.51% | 1.55% | 1.65% | 2.16% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 2.24% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 1.28% | 37.55% | 2.17% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, RSPF and TRUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.
RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for RSPF and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer