RSPF vs. TRUF
RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
RSPF vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RSPF
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPF vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | 15.48% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPF and TRUF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPF vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
RSPF
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPF vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPF vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.32% | -3.24% | -78.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -1.12% | -17.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPF vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPF | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 13.94% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 13.94% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 13.94% | +8.90% |
RSPF vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPF vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.65% | 2.16% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 2.24% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 1.28% | 37.55% | 2.17% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, RSPF and TRUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.
RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for RSPF and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer