PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPF vs. KBWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPF vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -8.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPF having a 11.37% annualized return and KBWP not far behind at 11.22%.


RSPF

1D
-1.76%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
-5.25%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
2.40%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
11.37%

KBWP

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-8.80%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
-7.04%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPF vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
-5.25%10.23%25.75%6.43%-10.64%36.36%5.49%31.53%-15.81%21.57%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
-8.80%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPF and KBWP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2010

0.66

The correlation between RSPF and KBWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPF vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPF
KBWP

Financial Services

92.7%
100.0%

Technology

6.1%

-

Industrials

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

RSPF
92.7%
KBWP
100.0%

Technology

RSPF
6.1%
KBWP

-

Industrials

RSPF
1.2%
KBWP

-

Basic Materials

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Communication Services

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Energy

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Healthcare

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Real Estate

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Utilities

RSPF

-

KBWP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPF vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPF
RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPF vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPFKBWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.94

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

-0.74

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

-1.56

+2.04

RSPF vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPF Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPF and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPFKBWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

-0.44

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.54

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.69

-0.48

Drawdowns

RSPF vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and KBWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPFKBWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.32%

-39.76%

-41.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

-9.56%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-12.29%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-17.00%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

-39.76%

-5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.99%

-9.56%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.04%

-4.37%

-14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

4.72%

+0.33%

Volatility

RSPF vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) is 3.35%, while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that RSPF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPFKBWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

4.16%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

11.41%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

16.20%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

18.53%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

20.70%

+2.21%

RSPF vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPF vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than KBWP's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
2.03%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
1.70%1.55%1.65%2.16%1.95%1.56%2.24%1.85%2.51%1.28%37.55%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPF and KBWP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWP has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to RSPF (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPF dropped -81.32% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

On 10-year performance, RSPF leads with 11.37% vs 11.22% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RSPF has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPF has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.70% for RSPF.

RSPF tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.35% for KBWP.

RSPF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPF and KBWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer