RSPE vs. SPHB
RSPE (Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - RSPE tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index while SPHB tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSPE returned 16.43%/yr vs 29.63%/yr for SPHB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPHB.
Performance
RSPE vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 30.36% return.
RSPE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 12.37%
- YTD
- 30.36%
- 6M
- 31.36%
- 1Y
- 69.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.19%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
RSPE vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPE Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 12.08% | 14.58% | 10.87% | 13.97% | -12.21% | 1.37% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 30.36% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPE and SPHB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between RSPE and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPE vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPE
SPHB
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
RSPE
SPHB
Financial Services
RSPE
SPHB
Industrials
RSPE
SPHB
Healthcare
RSPE
SPHB
Consumer Cyclical
RSPE
SPHB
Consumer Defensive
RSPE
SPHB
Real Estate
RSPE
SPHB
-
Basic Materials
RSPE
SPHB
Communication Services
RSPE
SPHB
Utilities
RSPE
SPHB
Energy
RSPE
-
SPHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPE vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank
RSPE
SPHB
RSPE vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPE | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.50 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 6.52 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 25.92 | -14.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPE | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 3.16 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
RSPE vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and SPHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPE | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -46.84% | +23.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -10.70% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.58% | -29.21% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.67% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -8.50% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.69% | -0.43% |
Volatility
RSPE vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is 2.97%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that RSPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPE | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 7.14% | -4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 16.99% | -7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 22.16% | -9.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 27.38% | -10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 28.45% | -11.70% |
RSPE vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSPE vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison
RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than SPHB's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPE Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 1.91% | 1.83% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPE and SPHB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to RSPE (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs SPHB's -46.84%.
On 3-year performance, SPHB leads with 29.63% vs 16.43% for RSPE. On fees, RSPE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.
RSPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.52% for SPHB.
RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSPE and 0.25% for SPHB.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPE and SPHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer