PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPE vs. RSPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPE vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than RSPM's 15.78% return.


RSPE

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.26%
YTD
12.08%
6M
13.64%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*

RSPM

1D
0.11%
1M
1.21%
YTD
15.78%
6M
18.94%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPE vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
12.08%14.58%10.87%13.97%-12.21%1.37%
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF
15.78%6.90%-1.30%8.32%-9.95%1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPE and RSPM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.84

The correlation between RSPE and RSPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPE vs. RSPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPE
RSPM

Technology

21.3%

-

Financial Services

15.3%
0.0%

Industrials

14.7%
3.5%

Healthcare

12.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
20.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%

-

Real Estate

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

5.0%
79.4%

Communication Services

3.7%

-

Utilities

3.1%

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

RSPE
21.3%
RSPM

-

Financial Services

RSPE
15.3%
RSPM
0.0%

Industrials

RSPE
14.7%
RSPM
3.5%

Healthcare

RSPE
12.9%
RSPM

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPE
10.0%
RSPM
20.6%

Consumer Defensive

RSPE
7.3%
RSPM

-

Real Estate

RSPE
6.5%
RSPM

-

Basic Materials

RSPE
5.0%
RSPM
79.4%

Communication Services

RSPE
3.7%
RSPM

-

Utilities

RSPE
3.1%
RSPM

-

Energy

RSPE

-

RSPM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPE vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPM
RSPM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RSPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPM Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPE vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPERSPMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.33

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

1.98

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.96

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.80

5.36

+6.44

RSPE vs. RSPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the RSPM Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPE and RSPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPERSPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.33

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.39

+0.12

Drawdowns

RSPE vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum RSPM drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and RSPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPERSPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-61.18%

+38.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-12.32%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-27.19%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-4.13%

+3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-8.79%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

4.49%

-2.23%

Volatility

RSPE vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is 2.97%, while Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that RSPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPERSPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

5.82%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

13.40%

-4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

18.15%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

20.12%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

21.93%

-5.18%

RSPE vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPE vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison

RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than RSPM's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.47%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF
1.50%2.06%2.04%2.05%2.19%1.43%1.57%1.81%1.83%1.50%1.28%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPE and RSPM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPM has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to RSPE (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs RSPM's -61.18%.

On 3-year performance, RSPE leads with 16.43% vs 10.35% for RSPM. On fees, RSPE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RSPE has performed better with a 16.43% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPM.

RSPM has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.47% for RSPE.

RSPE is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPM is Materials. RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while RSPM tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSPE and 0.40% for RSPM.

RSPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPE and RSPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer