RSPD vs. XLYI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and XLYI (State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while XLYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. RSPD is passively managed, while XLYI is actively managed. Over the past year, RSPD returned 6.06% vs 10.54% for XLYI. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLYI.

Performance

RSPD vs. XLYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than XLYI's 1.38% return.

RSPD

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: -2.22%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 8.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.32%

XLYI

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 1.30%
• 6M: -1.42%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	$3.23M	$2.98M	$3.50M
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$80.11K	$62.91K	$60.52K

RSPD vs. XLYI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.19%	2.44%
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	1.38%	5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and XLYI is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.77

The correlation between RSPD and XLYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPD vs. XLYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPD	XLYI
Consumer Cyclical	93.6%	99.0%
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Technology	2.2%	1.0%
Industrials	1.8%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	99.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. XLYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 18
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

XLYI

XLYI Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
XLYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XLYI Omega Ratio Rank: 25
XLYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XLYI Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPD vs. XLYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPD	XLYI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.65	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	0.99	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.12	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	0.86	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.99	2.44	-1.45

RSPD vs. XLYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the XLYI Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and XLYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. XLYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than XLYI's maximum drawdown of -12.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and XLYI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPD	XLYI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.00%	-12.32%	-55.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-12.32%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.85%	-2.24%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-3.29%	-7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	4.33%	+1.81%

Volatility

RSPD vs. XLYI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) is 6.00%, while State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that RSPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPD	XLYI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	6.61%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.62%	13.08%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	16.31%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.19%	16.37%	+5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.13%	16.37%	+6.76%

RSPD vs. XLYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPD vs. XLYI - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than XLYI's 15.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	0.86%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	15.73%	6.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPD and XLYI in my portfolio?

RSPD and XLYI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPD or XLYI?

XLYI has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to RSPD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPD dropped -68.00% vs XLYI's -12.32%.

Which ETF is better, RSPD or XLYI?

On 1-year performance, XLYI leads with 10.54% vs 6.06% for RSPD. On fees, XLYI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPD or XLYI?

Over the 1-year period, XLYI has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPD or XLYI?

XLYI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPD or XLYI?

XLYI has the higher dividend yield at 15.73%, compared with 0.86% for RSPD.

What is the main difference between RSPD and XLYI?

RSPD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.35% for XLYI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.