RSPD vs. PEZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while PEZ is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPD returned 8.01%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for PEZ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEZ.

Performance

RSPD vs. PEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly higher than PEZ's -4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPD has underperformed PEZ with an annualized return of 8.01%, while PEZ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.41% annualized return.

RSPD

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: 6.90%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

PEZ

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: -4.66%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 14.66%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 9.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPD vs. PEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	-3.92%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	28.75%	11.43%	25.88%	-8.79%	15.04%
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	-4.66%	5.40%	20.06%	29.55%	-29.59%	20.35%	38.97%	18.05%	-6.85%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and PEZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.80

The correlation between RSPD and PEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPD vs. PEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPD	PEZ
Consumer Cyclical	93.8%	66.0%
Technology	2.2%	4.0%
Communication Services	2.0%	11.9%
Industrials	1.9%	3.8%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	6.9%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. PEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 14
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PEZ

PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 13
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPD vs. PEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPD	PEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	0.26	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	0.53	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.06	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	0.39	+0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.25	1.03	+0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPD vs. PEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the PEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and PEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPD	PEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	0.26	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.10	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.38	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.32	+0.01

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. PEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than PEZ's maximum drawdown of -58.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and PEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPD	PEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.00%	-58.39%	-9.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-15.83%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.01%	-31.48%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	-41.72%	+7.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	-52.05%	+4.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.70%	-11.65%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-13.86%	+3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.49%	5.93%	-0.44%

Volatility

RSPD vs. PEZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) at 5.42%. This indicates that RSPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPD	PEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	5.42%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	15.12%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	20.08%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.10%	24.50%	-2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.11%	25.06%	-1.95%

RSPD vs. PEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PEZ's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPD vs. PEZ - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than PEZ's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	0.22%	0.11%	0.12%	0.60%	0.43%	0.23%	0.39%	0.01%	0.40%	0.42%	0.83%	0.64%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.02%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPD and PEZ in my portfolio?

RSPD and PEZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPD or PEZ?

RSPD has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to PEZ (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPD dropped -68.00% vs PEZ's -58.39%.

Which ETF is better, RSPD or PEZ?

On 10-year performance, PEZ leads with 9.41% vs 8.01% for RSPD. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPD or PEZ?

Over the 10-year period, PEZ has performed better with a 9.41% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPD or PEZ?

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPD or PEZ?

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

What is the main difference between RSPD and PEZ?

RSPD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PEZ is Momentum. RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.60% for PEZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.