RSPD vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RSPD is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPD returned 3.29%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EATZ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

RSPD vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's 4.80% return.

RSPD

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: 6.90%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: -6.74%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPD vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	-3.92%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	7.39%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and EATZ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.77

The correlation between RSPD and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPD vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPD	EATZ
Consumer Cyclical	93.8%	78.2%
Technology	2.2%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	2.3%
Industrials	1.9%	4.9%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	16.9%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 14
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPD vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPD	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	0.10	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	0.28	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.03	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	0.11	+0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.25	0.21	+1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPD vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and EATZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPD	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	0.10	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.10	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.12	+0.21

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPD	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.00%	-34.40%	-33.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-23.21%	+9.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.01%	-23.21%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	-33.34%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.70%	-13.56%	+4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-13.40%	+2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.49%	12.82%	-7.33%

Volatility

RSPD vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) at 4.91%. This indicates that RSPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPD	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	4.91%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	13.48%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	18.81%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.10%	21.65%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.11%	21.60%	+1.51%

RSPD vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPD vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.02%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPD and EATZ in my portfolio?

RSPD and EATZ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPD or EATZ?

RSPD has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to EATZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPD dropped -68.00% vs EATZ's -34.40%.

Which ETF is better, RSPD or EATZ?

On 5-year performance, RSPD leads with 3.29% vs 2.20% for EATZ. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EATZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPD or EATZ?

Over the 5-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPD or EATZ?

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPD or EATZ?

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between RSPD and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 1.00% for EATZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.