RSPD vs. EATZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ).
RSPD and EATZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. EATZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 20, 2021.
Performance
RSPD vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPD vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -5.55% | 7.98% | 13.37% | 22.55% | -24.03% | 7.39% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | -0.50% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -5.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's -0.50% return.
RSPD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -6.80%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
EATZ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- -5.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPD vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPD vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank
RSPD
EATZ
RSPD vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPD | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | -0.27 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | -0.26 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.97 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | -0.20 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | -0.39 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPD | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.27 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.07 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPD and EATZ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RSPD vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison
RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than EATZ's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.04% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RSPD vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and EATZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPD | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.00% | -34.40% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -23.21% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -17.93% | +7.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -13.39% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 12.18% | -7.48% |
Volatility
RSPD vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) at 5.06%. This indicates that RSPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPD | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.06% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 13.54% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 21.22% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 21.64% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 21.64% | +1.37% |