RSPC vs. IBIC
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSPC returned -2.95% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
RSPC vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -10.64%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -2.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPC vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -10.64% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 5.88% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and IBIC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.06 |
The correlation between RSPC and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
IBIC
RSPC vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 2.22 | -1.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 16.56 | -16.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 58.67 | -59.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -0.90% | -37.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -0.27% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -0.08% | -13.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -0.10% | -12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 0.08% | +5.77% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that RSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 0.17% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 0.67% | +9.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 0.89% | +12.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 1.56% | +17.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 1.56% | +19.18% |
RSPC vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.84% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and IBIC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPC has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs -2.95% for RSPC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.84% for RSPC.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer