RSPC vs. BWET
RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSPC returned 10.22%/yr vs 123.86%/yr for BWET. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
RSPC vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPC achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.
RSPC
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -10.64%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -2.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- 18.43%
- YTD
- 968.33%
- 6M
- 944.72%
- 1Y
- 1,424.52%
- 3Y*
- 123.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPC vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | -10.64% | 18.44% | 17.98% | 10.43% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 968.33% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPC and BWET is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPC vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
RSPC
BWET
RSPC vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPC | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.87 | -0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 47.03 | -47.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 147.28 | -147.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPC vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPC | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -56.90% | +18.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -30.64% | +16.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -56.81% | +42.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -5.48% | -7.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -23.76% | +11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 11.60% | -5.75% |
Volatility
RSPC vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 4.67%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 26.27%. This indicates that RSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPC | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 26.27% | -21.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 89.01% | -79.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 98.57% | -84.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 70.47% | -51.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 70.47% | -49.73% |
RSPC vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPC vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF | 1.84% | 1.66% | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.45% | 1.10% | 1.05% | 0.90% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPC and BWET have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to RSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPC dropped -38.03% vs BWET's -56.90%.
On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 123.86% vs 10.22% for RSPC. On fees, RSPC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 123.86% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while BWET is Commodities. RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 3.50% for BWET.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPC and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer