RSPC vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. RSPC is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RSPC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

RSPC vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RSPC

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -5.94%
• YTD: -11.21%
• 6M: -11.40%
• 1Y: -4.51%
• 3Y*: 9.99%
• 5Y*: -0.97%
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPC vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	-5.94%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-8.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPC and BPH is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.08

RSPC vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPC	BPH
Communication Services	95.2%	-
Technology	4.8%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPC vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPC

RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPC vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPC	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	—	—

Drawdowns

RSPC vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPC drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPC and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPC	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.03%	-12.01%	-26.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.95%	-12.01%	-1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-3.60%	-9.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSPC	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.81%	26.17%	-12.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.60%	26.17%	-7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.73%	26.17%	-5.44%

RSPC vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPC vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

RSPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than BPH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	1.85%	1.66%	1.03%	0.98%	1.45%	1.10%	1.05%	0.90%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPC and BPH in my portfolio?

RSPC and BPH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSPC or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPC or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPC or BPH?

RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.55% for BPH.

What is the main difference between RSPC and BPH?

RSPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPC and 0.19% for BPH.