PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPA vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSPA vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSPA vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
0.42%11.07%3.68%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.35%10.25%4.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -5.35% return.


RSPA

1D
1.49%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
0.42%
6M
2.58%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XCLR

1D
1.50%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPA vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSPA vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPA
RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPA vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPAXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.96

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.39

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.27

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.32

5.31

+0.01

RSPA vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPA and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPAXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.96

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.58

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and XCLR is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RSPA vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, less than XCLR's 13.90% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
9.37%9.14%4.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.90%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPAXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-14.63%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-8.29%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-6.91%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-4.82%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.98%

+0.34%

Volatility

RSPA vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.39%. This indicates that RSPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSPAXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.39%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

7.15%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

10.52%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

10.58%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

10.58%

+2.81%