RSPA vs. SCHD
RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSPA returned 18.38% vs 27.16% for SCHD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
RSPA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
RSPA
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
RSPA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 7.86% | 11.07% | 3.68% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPA and SCHD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RSPA and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPA
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSPA
SCHD
Industrials
RSPA
SCHD
Financial Services
RSPA
SCHD
Healthcare
RSPA
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
RSPA
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
RSPA
SCHD
Real Estate
RSPA
SCHD
-
Utilities
RSPA
SCHD
Energy
RSPA
SCHD
Basic Materials
RSPA
SCHD
Communication Services
RSPA
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
RSPA
SCHD
RSPA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.45 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 5.91 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 14.53 | -2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.49 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.86 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
RSPA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -33.37% | +18.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.21% | -4.61% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.40% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -3.32% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.88% | -0.33% |
Volatility
RSPA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is 1.95%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that RSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 2.66% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 7.66% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.36% | 10.96% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 14.38% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 16.72% | -3.72% |
RSPA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 8.98% | 9.14% | 4.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to RSPA (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPA dropped -15.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 1-year performance, SCHD leads with 27.16% vs 18.38% for RSPA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RSPA has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 27.16% return vs 18.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RSPA.
RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 3.26% for SCHD.
RSPA is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHD is Dividend. RSPA tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RSPA and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPA and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer