RSPA vs. RSPG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG).
RSPA and RSPG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2025. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. Both RSPA and RSPG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RSPA vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSPA vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 1.28% | 11.07% | 3.68% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 33.74% | 7.01% | -6.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 33.74% return.
RSPA
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 12.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 33.74%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 31.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPA vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSPA vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank
RSPA
RSPG
RSPA vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPA | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.15 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.55 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 4.32 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPA | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.15 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.18 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPA and RSPG is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RSPA vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison
RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than RSPG's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.14% | 4.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.95% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Drawdowns
RSPA vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and RSPG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPA | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -79.98% | +64.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -21.05% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -6.04% | +2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -25.63% | +23.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 7.55% | -5.22% |
Volatility
RSPA vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is 3.90%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that RSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSPA | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 6.30% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 15.29% | -7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 27.69% | -12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 28.51% | -15.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 33.58% | -20.19% |