RSPA vs. QQA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while QQA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Invesco. RSPA is passively managed, while QQA is actively managed. Over the past year, RSPA returned 18.38% vs 32.22% for QQA. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.

Performance

RSPA vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.

RSPA

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 7.86%
• 6M: 8.49%
• 1Y: 18.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQA

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 32.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPA vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	7.86%	11.07%	3.68%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	14.57%	17.24%	7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and QQA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	0.65

The correlation between RSPA and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPA vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPA	QQA
Technology	18.3%	53.8%
Industrials	14.7%	2.8%
Financial Services	14.4%	0.2%
Healthcare	10.9%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	7.7%
Real Estate	6.2%	0.1%
Utilities	6.0%	1.4%
Energy	4.5%	0.6%
Basic Materials	4.1%	1.1%
Communication Services	4.0%	15.8%

Return for Risk

RSPA vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPA

RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 59
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPA vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPA	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.57	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	3.47	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.46	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	3.70	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.88	16.59	-4.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPA vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPA and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPA	QQA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.57	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.18	-0.23

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPA	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.37%	-19.73%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.21%	-8.76%	+2.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-0.10%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-2.44%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	1.95%	-0.40%

Volatility

RSPA vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is 1.95%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that RSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPA	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	2.91%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.66%	9.68%	-3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.36%	12.59%	-3.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.00%	18.27%	-5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	18.27%	-5.27%

RSPA vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPA and QQA have an expense ratio of 0.29%.

Dividends

RSPA vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, less than QQA's 9.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.29%	9.78%	4.29%
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	8.98%	9.14%	4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPA and QQA in my portfolio?

RSPA and QQA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPA or QQA?

QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to RSPA (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPA dropped -15.37% vs QQA's -19.73%.

Which ETF is better, RSPA or QQA?

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 18.38% for RSPA. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, RSPA has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPA or QQA?

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 18.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPA or QQA?

RSPA and QQA have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPA or QQA?

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 8.98% for RSPA.

What is the main difference between RSPA and QQA?

RSPA is categorized as S&P 500, while QQA is Derivative Income.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.