RSP vs. VTV
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.01%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
RSP vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 13.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 12.01%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
VTV
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
RSP vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.96% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 13.24% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and VTV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between RSP and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSP vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
VTV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
VTV
Financial Services
RSP
VTV
Industrials
RSP
VTV
Healthcare
RSP
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
VTV
Consumer Defensive
RSP
VTV
Real Estate
RSP
VTV
Utilities
RSP
VTV
Energy
RSP
VTV
Basic Materials
RSP
VTV
Communication Services
RSP
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
VTV
RSP vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.18 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 15.75 | -6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -59.27% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -6.35% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -14.52% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -17.04% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -36.78% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -7.86% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.68% | +0.39% |
Volatility
RSP vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.25%. This indicates that RSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 3.25% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 7.88% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 10.34% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 13.92% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 16.68% | +1.68% |
RSP vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than VTV's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RSP and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RSP has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to VTV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.64% vs 12.01% for RSP. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 12.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer