PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.59% return.


RSP

1D
1.56%
1M
2.91%
YTD
9.96%
6M
8.60%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
12.01%

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.96%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%26.72%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.59%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and SGOV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-272.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

195.05

-193.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

397.15

-394.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

4,450.29

-4,441.06

RSP vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSP vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-0.03%

-59.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-0.01%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-0.01%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-0.03%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-0.00%

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.00%

+2.07%

Volatility

RSP vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that RSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

0.05%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

0.13%

+8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

0.20%

+11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

0.24%

+15.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

0.24%

+18.12%

RSP vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RSP vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSP and SGOV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.40% vs 3.55% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.40% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.22 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer