RSP vs. LUNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, RSP returned 14.66%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RSP vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.

RSP

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 4.30%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 19.88%
• 3Y*: 14.66%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

LUNR

• 1D: -13.12%
• 1M: -25.39%
• YTD: 64.02%
• 6M: 122.39%
• 1Y: 144.44%
• 3Y*: 42.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	10.96%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	0.67%
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	64.02%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and LUNR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.24

The correlation between RSP and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSP vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 58
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 62

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 81
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSP	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.31	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.24	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	3.47	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.63	7.12	+2.51

RSP vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSP vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSP	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.92%	-97.43%	+37.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.85%	-41.94%	+34.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.81%	-78.54%	+60.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-67.53%	+67.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-63.21%	+56.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	20.37%	-18.30%

Volatility

RSP vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.57%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSP	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	42.95%	-39.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.59%	93.42%	-84.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.83%	111.16%	-99.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	171.29%	-155.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	171.29%	-152.93%

Dividends

RSP vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.47%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSP and LUNR in my portfolio?

RSP and LUNR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSP or LUNR?

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to RSP (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.