RSP vs. IXC
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.01%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for IXC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
RSP vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 28.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 12.01%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
IXC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 6M
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
RSP vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.96% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 28.81% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and IXC is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2003 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RSP and IXC has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RSP vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
IXC
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
RSP
IXC
-
Financial Services
RSP
IXC
-
Industrials
RSP
IXC
-
Healthcare
RSP
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
RSP
IXC
-
Real Estate
RSP
IXC
-
Utilities
RSP
IXC
-
Energy
RSP
IXC
Basic Materials
RSP
IXC
-
Communication Services
RSP
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
IXC
RSP vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.11 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 11.84 | -2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -67.88% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -9.66% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -19.06% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -24.93% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -64.16% | +25.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -7.29% | +6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -17.47% | +10.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 3.35% | -1.28% |
Volatility
RSP vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.55%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 6.43% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 15.64% | -6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 18.83% | -7.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 23.54% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 26.84% | -8.48% |
RSP vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSP vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than IXC's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.86% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and IXC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to RSP (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.01% vs 9.93% for IXC. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while IXC is Energy Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer