RSP vs. FXF
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.18%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FXF. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FXF.
Performance
RSP vs. FXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 12.18%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
FXF
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 1.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
RSP vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 11.61% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.56% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and FXF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, RSP and FXF have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
FXF
RSP vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.04 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.30 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.69 | 0.64 | +10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than FXF's maximum drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and FXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -35.58% | -24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -4.97% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -8.52% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -11.99% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -15.04% | -24.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.83% | +18.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -20.83% | +14.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.29% | -0.22% |
Volatility
RSP vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.84%. This indicates that RSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 1.84% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 5.53% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 7.42% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 8.33% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 7.57% | +10.80% |
RSP vs. FXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSP vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and FXF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSP has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FXF (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs FXF's -35.58%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.18% vs 1.05% for FXF. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while FXF is Currency. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while FXF tracks Swiss Franc. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.40% for FXF.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and FXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer