RSNRX vs. RMLPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RSNRX (Victory Global Energy Transition Fund) and RMLPX (Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RSNRX returned 31.12%/yr vs 23.85%/yr for RMLPX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSNRX charges 1.48%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RMLPX.

Performance

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSNRX achieves a 33.65% return, which is significantly higher than RMLPX's 26.92% return.

RSNRX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 33.65%
• 6M: 34.00%
• 1Y: 93.48%
• 3Y*: 31.23%
• 5Y*: 31.12%
• 10Y*: 12.71%

RMLPX

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -7.71%
• YTD: 26.92%
• 6M: 29.11%
• 1Y: 31.73%
• 3Y*: 27.54%
• 5Y*: 23.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund	33.65%	69.60%	15.94%	-8.64%	35.02%	83.01%	27.35%	-24.49%	-45.81%
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	26.92%	8.98%	30.03%	16.79%	35.03%	42.56%	-28.37%	15.33%	-15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RSNRX and RMLPX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between RSNRX and RMLPX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RSNRX vs. RMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSNRX

RSNRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
RSNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
RSNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RSNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RSNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RSNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

RMLPX

RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 58
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSNRX	RMLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.88	1.98	+1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.46	2.68	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.33	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.74	3.59	+4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.07	10.78	+14.29

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSNRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the RMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSNRX and RMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSNRX drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, which is greater than RMLPX's maximum drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSNRX and RMLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSNRX	RMLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.73%	-66.95%	-22.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.65%	-9.09%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.44%	-18.75%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-22.83%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	-9.09%	+5.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.89%	-10.22%	-15.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	3.02%	+0.57%

Volatility

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) at 6.06%. This indicates that RSNRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSNRX	RMLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.10%	6.06%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.14%	13.38%	+3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.25%	16.54%	+6.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.93%	21.40%	+3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.48%	28.01%	+3.47%

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSNRX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RMLPX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSNRX vs. RMLPX - Dividend Comparison

RSNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than RMLPX's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	5.08%	6.38%	7.63%	6.49%	7.08%	8.89%	13.48%	7.25%	5.85%
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund	3.28%	4.38%	1.65%	2.36%	0.78%	0.00%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSNRX and RMLPX in my portfolio?

RSNRX and RMLPX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSNRX or RMLPX?

RSNRX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to RMLPX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSNRX dropped -89.73% vs RMLPX's -66.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.