RSNRX vs. FSDPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX).
RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995. FSDPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986.
Performance
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 12.06% | 11.32% | -2.95% | 7.29% | -9.86% | 31.66% | 21.78% | 12.40% | -23.74% | 25.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSNRX achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than FSDPX's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, RSNRX has outperformed FSDPX with an annualized return of 13.96%, while FSDPX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
FSDPX
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 22.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSNRX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FSDPX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSNRX vs. FSDPX — Risk / Return Rank
RSNRX
FSDPX
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSNRX | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.08 | 1.13 | +2.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.47 | 1.66 | +2.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.22 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.33 | 1.77 | +5.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.20 | 5.96 | +21.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSNRX | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08 | 1.13 | +2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.33 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.39 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSNRX and FSDPX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Dividend Comparison
RSNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FSDPX's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 1.73% | 1.94% | 12.46% | 5.46% | 3.34% | 0.71% | 0.68% | 1.22% | 12.89% | 5.08% | 1.05% | 2.42% |
Drawdowns
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSNRX drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, which is greater than FSDPX's maximum drawdown of -64.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSNRX and FSDPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSNRX | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.73% | -64.19% | -25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | -13.53% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -25.39% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.27% | -49.89% | -34.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -5.54% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.07% | -11.33% | -14.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 4.01% | -0.14% |
Volatility
RSNRX vs. FSDPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) is 6.66%, while Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that RSNRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSNRX | FSDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 7.14% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.24% | 13.78% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 20.62% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 20.31% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.80% | 21.65% | +10.15% |