RSMV vs. GARY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RSMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

RSMV vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.69% return.

RSMV

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.86%
• 6M: 3.16%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.43%

GARY

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -4.25%
• 6M: 15.73%
• YTD: 25.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GARY Mango Growth ETF	$600.48K	$395.06K	$299.75K
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	$134.05K	$141.00K	$245.91K

RSMV vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	3.75%	0.22%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	25.69%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and GARY is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

RSMV vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 43
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSMV vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSMV	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	—	—

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -12.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMV	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-12.67%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.70%	-8.40%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-2.40%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSMV	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	22.34%	-8.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	22.34%	-7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	22.34%	-7.29%

RSMV vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMV vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.97%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMV and GARY in my portfolio?

RSMV and GARY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSMV or GARY?

On fees, GARY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSMV or GARY?

GARY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RSMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSMV or GARY?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between RSMV and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 0.77% for GARY.