RSMV vs. BDRY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. RSMV is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMV returned 23.44% vs 96.55% for BDRY. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. RSMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.

Performance

RSMV vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 29.99% return.

RSMV

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDRY

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -11.49%
• YTD: 29.99%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 96.55%
• 3Y*: 24.41%
• 5Y*: -17.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMV vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	8.95%	10.74%
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	29.99%	50.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and BDRY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

RSMV vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 64
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BDRY

BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 76
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMV vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSMV	BDRY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.30	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.77	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	4.49	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	12.52	-0.78

RSMV vs. BDRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BDRY Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMV and BDRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and BDRY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMV	BDRY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-89.16%	+71.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	-21.60%	+14.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-69.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-89.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-72.54%	+71.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-58.44%	+54.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	7.75%	-5.75%

Volatility

RSMV vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is 6.37%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that RSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSMV	BDRY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	7.10%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	29.23%	-18.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	42.19%	-29.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	60.21%	-45.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.06%	62.38%	-47.32%

RSMV vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMV vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.92%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMV and BDRY in my portfolio?

RSMV and BDRY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSMV or BDRY?

BDRY has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to RSMV (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMV dropped -17.58% vs BDRY's -89.16%.

Which ETF is better, RSMV or BDRY?

On 1-year performance, BDRY leads with 96.55% vs 23.44% for RSMV. On fees, RSMV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSMV has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSMV or BDRY?

Over the 1-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 96.55% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSMV or BDRY?

RSMV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSMV or BDRY?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.

What is the main difference between RSMV and BDRY?

RSMV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BDRY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 3.76% for BDRY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.