RSMOX vs. USBLX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RSMOX (Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and USBLX (USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - RSMOX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Victory, while USBLX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, RSMOX returned 8.99%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for USBLX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSMOX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for USBLX.

Performance

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMOX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than USBLX's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RSMOX has outperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 8.99%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.

RSMOX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 7.68%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

USBLX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 14.59%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund	9.91%	6.26%	23.99%	17.91%	-34.69%	3.85%	34.51%	28.06%	-7.57%	20.87%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	5.49%	10.30%	13.32%	16.10%	-15.82%	14.80%	10.78%	18.46%	-1.95%	13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMOX and USBLX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996	0.81

The correlation between RSMOX and USBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSMOX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMOX

RSMOX Risk / Return Rank: 12
RSMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
RSMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RSMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RSMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

USBLX

USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 79
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSMOX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	2.26	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	3.21	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.42	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	2.81	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	13.46	-10.16

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMOX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMOX drawdown since its inception was -63.76%, which is greater than USBLX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMOX and USBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMOX	USBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.76%	-33.49%	-30.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.78%	-5.24%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-11.66%	-17.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.51%	-20.51%	-32.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.51%	-21.93%	-30.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.57%	-1.14%	-14.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-4.29%	-14.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	1.09%	+2.58%

Volatility

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund (RSMOX) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) at 2.49%. This indicates that RSMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSMOX	USBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.44%	2.49%	+4.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.57%	5.25%	+10.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.21%	6.53%	+12.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.43%	8.70%	+21.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.53%	9.10%	+17.43%

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMOX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMOX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

RSMOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSMOX Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	38.37%	4.10%	0.00%	19.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	2.26%	1.96%	2.28%	2.11%	1.74%	1.66%	1.88%	1.95%	2.73%	2.16%	2.31%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMOX and USBLX in my portfolio?

RSMOX and USBLX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSMOX or USBLX?

RSMOX has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to USBLX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMOX dropped -63.76% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.