RSMC vs. SCHA
RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. RSMC is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMC returned 18.15% vs 45.36% for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
RSMC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMC achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 10.50% return.
RSMC
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- 1Y
- 45.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
RSMC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 6.73% | -1.02% | 0.68% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 10.50% | 11.60% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMC and SCHA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RSMC and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
RSMC
SCHA
RSMC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSMC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 2.45 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 3.41 | -1.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 5.16 | -3.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 18.95 | -12.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSMC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.45 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
RSMC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMC drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMC and SCHA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -42.41% | +20.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -9.50% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | 0.00% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -7.64% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.59% | +0.89% |
Volatility
RSMC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is 5.90%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that RSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSMC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 6.90% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 13.66% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 18.74% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 21.99% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 22.68% | -1.87% |
RSMC vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |