PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSIIX vs. PRFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than PRFRX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX has underperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.58% annualized return.


RSIIX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.69%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
5.18%

PRFRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.27%
6M
2.44%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
1.81%6.04%8.44%9.59%-3.31%11.60%3.42%3.50%1.36%4.84%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
1.27%9.82%11.04%13.78%-1.95%4.60%1.75%8.46%-0.08%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RSIIX and PRFRX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSIIX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSIIX
RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFRX
PRFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PRFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSIIXPRFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

2.18

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

5.45

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.66

20.01

-0.36

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the PRFRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSIIX and PRFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum PRFRX drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and PRFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSIIXPRFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-20.05%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-1.50%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.79%

-2.35%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.61%

-5.94%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.55%

-20.05%

+4.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.66%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-0.69%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.41%

-0.14%

Volatility

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) is 0.54%, while T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that RSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSIIXPRFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.65%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

1.93%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

2.70%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.51%

2.92%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

3.92%

-1.04%

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSIIX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison

RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than PRFRX's 9.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
9.81%9.99%10.20%9.57%4.03%3.86%4.00%4.84%4.87%4.04%4.07%4.07%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
7.41%7.75%7.67%7.61%6.58%5.12%5.77%4.84%4.59%4.98%5.10%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSIIX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFRX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to RSIIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSIIX dropped -15.55% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.

PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSIIX and PRFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer