PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSIIX vs. RCTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than RCTIX's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX has underperformed RCTIX with an annualized return of 5.02%, while RCTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.53% annualized return.


RSIIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.50%
6M
1.66%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.02%
ALL TIME*
4.50%

RCTIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.97%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
4.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
2.32%6.04%8.44%9.59%-3.31%11.60%3.42%3.50%1.36%4.84%
RCTIX
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund
1.55%7.75%7.49%10.02%-4.07%4.26%6.42%11.71%1.82%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RSIIX and RCTIX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSIIX vs. RCTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSIIX
RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RCTIX
RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSIIXRCTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.67

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.46

12.03

+3.43

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the RCTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSIIX and RCTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, which is greater than RCTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and RCTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSIIXRCTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-10.89%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-1.20%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.79%

-1.48%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.61%

-6.17%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.55%

-10.89%

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-1.07%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.37%

-0.10%

Volatility

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) is 0.56%, while River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that RSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSIIXRCTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.66%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

1.81%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

2.34%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.51%

2.50%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

3.74%

-0.86%

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RCTIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSIIX vs. RCTIX - Dividend Comparison

RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than RCTIX's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCTIX
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund
7.36%7.31%7.89%8.50%5.98%3.02%5.97%4.97%3.30%4.89%2.16%0.00%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
6.63%7.75%7.67%7.61%6.58%5.12%5.77%4.84%4.59%4.98%5.10%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSIIX and RCTIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCTIX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to RSIIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSIIX dropped -15.55% vs RCTIX's -10.89%.

RCTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSIIX and RCTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer