RSIIX vs. FGUMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSIIX (RiverPark Strategic Income Fund) and FGUMX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RSIIX returned 5.14%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for FGUMX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSIIX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FGUMX.

Performance

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than FGUMX's 3.73% return.

RSIIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 5.83%
• 3Y*: 7.23%
• 5Y*: 5.14%
• 10Y*: 5.27%

FGUMX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 4.46%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund	1.81%	6.04%	8.44%	9.59%	-3.31%	11.60%	3.42%	3.50%	-0.86%
FGUMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z	3.73%	9.92%	9.53%	11.08%	-13.03%	3.72%	2.41%	14.34%	-3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RSIIX and FGUMX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.41

Return for Risk

RSIIX vs. FGUMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSIIX

RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 68
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FGUMX

FGUMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FGUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FGUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FGUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FGUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSIIX	FGUMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	3.26	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	5.75	-3.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.80	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	5.22	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.60	24.91	-2.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the FGUMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSIIX and FGUMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSIIX	FGUMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	3.26	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.05	0.84	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	0.75	+0.92

Drawdowns

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum FGUMX drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and FGUMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSIIX	FGUMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.55%	-22.36%	+6.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.79%	-2.21%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.79%	-4.15%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.61%	-16.53%	+10.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-3.49%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.46%	-0.20%

Volatility

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that RSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGUMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSIIX	FGUMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	1.19%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.83%	2.68%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.08%	3.54%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.52%	5.33%	-2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.88%	6.38%	-3.50%

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FGUMX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSIIX vs. FGUMX - Dividend Comparison

RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than FGUMX's 6.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGUMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z	6.43%	6.49%	6.19%	5.48%	3.98%	4.12%	4.78%	5.17%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund	7.41%	7.75%	7.67%	7.61%	6.58%	5.12%	5.77%	4.84%	4.59%	4.98%	5.10%	6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSIIX and FGUMX in my portfolio?

RSIIX and FGUMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSIIX or FGUMX?

FGUMX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to RSIIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSIIX dropped -15.55% vs FGUMX's -22.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.