FGUMX vs. FQTIX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX).

FGUMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 4, 2018. FQTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2019.

Performance

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FGUMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z	-0.09%	9.92%	9.53%	11.08%	-13.03%	3.72%	2.41%	6.33%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	1.02%	7.51%	8.03%	13.44%	-14.39%	8.51%	3.68%	4.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGUMX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 1.02% return.

FGUMX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: -0.09%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: 9.11%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: —

FQTIX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 1.02%
• 6M: 3.05%
• 1Y: 9.98%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGUMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.

FGUMX

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z

FQTIX

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I

Return for Risk

FGUMX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGUMX

FGUMX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FGUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FGUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FGUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FGUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FQTIX

FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGUMX	FQTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.68	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.64	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.64	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	4.19	-1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	18.41	-6.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGUMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGUMX and FQTIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGUMX	FQTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.68	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.63	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.56	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FGUMX and FQTIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

FGUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than FQTIX's 7.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGUMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z	6.02%	6.49%	6.19%	5.48%	3.98%	4.12%	4.78%	5.17%	0.44%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	7.00%	5.70%	7.86%	7.64%	8.10%	7.15%	6.89%	5.63%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGUMX drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGUMX and FQTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGUMX	FQTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-24.62%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.32%	-2.41%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	-18.81%	+2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-1.47%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-4.42%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.55%	+0.20%

Volatility

FGUMX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) is 1.54%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that FGUMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGUMX	FQTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	1.68%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.40%	2.43%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.02%	3.87%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.28%	5.93%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.41%	7.80%	-1.39%