PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGUMX vs. CRDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGUMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z
-0.09%9.92%9.53%11.08%-13.03%3.72%2.16%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
-1.45%7.48%8.69%8.06%-10.62%2.66%1.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGUMX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than CRDOX's -1.45% return.


FGUMX

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
1.23%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*

CRDOX

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
0.10%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGUMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDOX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FGUMX vs. CRDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGUMX
FGUMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FGUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FGUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDOX
CRDOX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CRDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGUMXCRDOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.04

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.80

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.81

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

8.08

+4.17

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGUMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the CRDOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGUMX and CRDOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGUMXCRDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.04

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.66

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.72

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FGUMX and CRDOX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Dividend Comparison

FGUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than CRDOX's 6.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FGUMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z
6.02%6.49%6.19%5.48%3.98%4.12%4.78%5.17%0.44%
CRDOX
Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund
6.34%5.18%6.96%6.86%5.82%2.73%0.33%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGUMX drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, which is greater than CRDOX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGUMX and CRDOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FGUMXCRDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-15.92%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-3.14%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-15.92%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-2.81%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-3.63%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.70%

+0.05%

Volatility

FGUMX vs. CRDOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) at 1.44%. This indicates that FGUMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FGUMXCRDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

1.44%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

2.19%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

3.28%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

4.11%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

4.04%

+2.37%