RSIIX vs. CIK
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK).
RSIIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2013. CIK is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II Constrained Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 1987.
Performance
RSIIX vs. CIK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSIIX vs. CIK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 0.36% | 6.04% | 8.44% | 9.59% | -3.31% | 11.60% | 3.42% | 3.50% | 1.36% | 4.84% |
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | -7.38% | 7.53% | 1.01% | 36.79% | -19.19% | 17.88% | 7.39% | 26.82% | -8.94% | 13.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than CIK's -7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX has underperformed CIK with an annualized return of 5.50%, while CIK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.20% annualized return.
RSIIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
CIK
- 1D
- 4.49%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -7.38%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- -3.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSIIX vs. CIK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CIK's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSIIX vs. CIK — Risk / Return Rank
RSIIX
CIK
RSIIX vs. CIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | -0.21 | +2.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | -0.20 | +3.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 0.97 | +0.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | -0.19 | +3.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | -0.60 | +15.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | -0.21 | +2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.27 | 0.24 | +2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.98 | 0.48 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.22 | +1.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSIIX and CIK is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RSIIX vs. CIK - Dividend Comparison
RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, less than CIK's 10.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 7.62% | 7.75% | 7.67% | 7.61% | 6.58% | 5.12% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 4.59% | 4.98% | 5.10% | 6.57% |
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | 10.45% | 9.54% | 9.34% | 8.63% | 10.71% | 7.87% | 8.57% | 8.39% | 9.64% | 7.98% | 8.35% | 9.50% |
Drawdowns
RSIIX vs. CIK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum CIK drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and CIK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.55% | -54.81% | +39.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | -15.49% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.61% | -26.22% | +20.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.55% | -39.15% | +23.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -11.70% | +10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -13.34% | +12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 5.00% | -4.64% |
Volatility
RSIIX vs. CIK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) is 1.14%, while Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that RSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 6.45% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.61% | 9.39% | -7.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30% | 14.62% | -12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.30% | 16.28% | -13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 17.28% | -14.50% |