RSIIX vs. CIK
RSIIX (RiverPark Strategic Income Fund) and CIK (Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX returned 5.12%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for CIK. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSIIX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIK.
Performance
RSIIX vs. CIK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSIIX achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than CIK's -8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RSIIX has underperformed CIK with an annualized return of 5.12%, while CIK has yielded a comparatively higher 7.23% annualized return.
RSIIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
CIK
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -8.12%
- 1Y
- -8.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
RSIIX vs. CIK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 2.65% | 6.04% | 8.44% | 9.59% | -3.31% | 11.60% | 3.42% | 3.50% | 1.36% | 4.84% |
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | -8.12% | 7.53% | 1.01% | 36.79% | -19.19% | 17.88% | 7.39% | 26.82% | -8.94% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSIIX and CIK is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSIIX vs. CIK — Risk / Return Rank
RSIIX
CIK
RSIIX vs. CIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 0.87 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | -0.58 | +3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.11 | -1.14 | +21.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSIIX vs. CIK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSIIX drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum CIK drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSIIX and CIK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.55% | -54.81% | +39.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.79% | -15.49% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.79% | -15.66% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.61% | -26.22% | +20.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.55% | -39.15% | +23.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.41% | +12.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -13.32% | +12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | 7.84% | -7.57% |
Volatility
RSIIX vs. CIK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) is 0.60%, while Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that RSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSIIX | CIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 2.89% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 9.01% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10% | 11.38% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 15.95% | -13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 17.27% | -14.39% |
RSIIX vs. CIK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSIIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CIK's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSIIX vs. CIK - Dividend Comparison
RSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, less than CIK's 10.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | 10.48% | 9.54% | 9.34% | 8.63% | 10.71% | 7.87% | 8.57% | 8.39% | 9.64% | 7.98% | 8.35% | 9.50% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 7.25% | 7.75% | 7.67% | 7.61% | 6.58% | 5.12% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 4.59% | 4.98% | 5.10% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSIIX and CIK have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIK has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to RSIIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSIIX dropped -15.55% vs CIK's -54.81%.
RSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSIIX and CIK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer