CIK vs. CSAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) and Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX).
CIK is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II Constrained Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 1987. CSAIX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Sep 27, 2012.
Performance
CIK vs. CSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIK vs. CSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | -7.38% | 7.53% | 1.01% | 36.79% | -19.19% | 17.88% | 7.39% | 26.82% | -8.94% | 13.39% |
CSAIX Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.62% | -5.84% | -5.57% | -6.15% | 21.24% | 7.46% | 1.86% | -4.39% | -4.01% | -1.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIK achieves a -7.38% return, which is significantly lower than CSAIX's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CIK has outperformed CSAIX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while CSAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.15% annualized return.
CIK
- 1D
- 4.49%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -7.38%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- -3.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
CSAIX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- -4.04%
- 3Y*
- -3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 0.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIK vs. CSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIK has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSAIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIK vs. CSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIK
CSAIX
CIK vs. CSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) and Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | -0.38 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | -0.39 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.94 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.32 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | -0.45 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | -0.38 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.07 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.01 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.23 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIK and CSAIX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CIK vs. CSAIX - Dividend Comparison
CIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than CSAIX's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | 10.45% | 9.54% | 9.34% | 8.63% | 10.71% | 7.87% | 8.57% | 8.39% | 9.64% | 7.98% | 8.35% | 9.50% |
CSAIX Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.91% | 2.27% | 2.95% | 0.52% | 18.80% | 8.84% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 8.69% |
Drawdowns
CIK vs. CSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIK drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than CSAIX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIK and CSAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -28.79% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.49% | -13.92% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | -28.79% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -28.79% | -10.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.70% | -20.43% | +8.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -9.43% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 10.41% | -5.41% |
Volatility
CIK vs. CSAIX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) at 4.58%. This indicates that CIK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.58% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 10.04% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 12.60% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 10.42% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 10.02% | +7.26% |