CIK vs. CSAIX
CIK (Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund) and CSAIX (Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - CIK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II Constrained Index, while CSAIX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by Credit Suisse. Over the past 10 years, CIK returned 7.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for CSAIX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CIK charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CSAIX.
Performance
CIK vs. CSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIK achieves a -8.49% return, which is significantly lower than CSAIX's 2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CIK has outperformed CSAIX with an annualized return of 7.19%, while CSAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.03% annualized return.
CIK
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- -8.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
CSAIX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 9.43%
- 3Y*
- -4.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
CIK vs. CSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | -8.49% | 7.53% | 1.01% | 36.79% | -19.19% | 17.88% | 7.39% | 26.82% | -8.94% | 13.39% |
CSAIX Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.64% | -5.84% | -5.57% | -6.15% | 21.24% | 7.46% | 1.86% | -4.39% | -4.01% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIK and CSAIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2011 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIK vs. CSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIK
CSAIX
CIK vs. CSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) and Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 1.24 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 3.09 | -4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIK vs. CSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIK drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than CSAIX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIK and CSAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -28.79% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.49% | -7.73% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -22.02% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | -28.79% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -28.79% | -10.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.76% | -20.42% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -9.60% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 3.10% | +4.70% |
Volatility
CIK vs. CSAIX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund (CSAIX) at 2.67%. This indicates that CIK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIK | CSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.67% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 10.37% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.40% | 11.63% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 10.41% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 10.08% | +7.19% |
CIK vs. CSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIK has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSAIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIK vs. CSAIX - Dividend Comparison
CIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than CSAIX's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIK Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund | 10.53% | 9.54% | 9.34% | 8.63% | 10.71% | 7.87% | 8.57% | 8.39% | 9.64% | 7.98% | 8.35% | 9.50% |
CSAIX Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 3.00% | 2.27% | 2.95% | 0.52% | 18.80% | 8.84% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 8.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIK and CSAIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIK has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to CSAIX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIK dropped -54.81% vs CSAIX's -28.79%.
CSAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIK and CSAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer