PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CIK vs. CSQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CIK vs. CSQAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX).

CIK is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II Constrained Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 1987. CSQAX is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse Liquid Alternative Beta Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2012. Both CIK and CSQAX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CIK vs. CSQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CIK vs. CSQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIK
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund		-7.38%7.53%1.01%36.79%-19.19%17.88%7.39%26.82%-8.94%13.39%
CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares		0.95%0.73%0.66%1.72%5.52%9.98%6.10%2.88%-4.31%4.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIK achieves a -7.38% return, which is significantly lower than CSQAX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CIK has outperformed CSQAX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while CSQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.09% annualized return.

CIK

1D
4.49%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
-7.38%
6M
-8.38%
1Y
-3.01%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
8.20%

CSQAX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.62%
1Y
-1.45%
3Y*
2.50%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund

Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares

Often compared with CIK:
CIK vs. CHIAXCIK vs. CSAIXCIK vs. JIRECIK vs. CRSOXCIK vs. CWFIXCIK vs. RSIIXCIK vs. XILSX
Often compared with CSQAX:
CSQAX vs. QUALCSQAX vs. PFFACSQAX vs. RCTIXCSQAX vs. CHIAXCSQAX vs. SHRIXCSQAX vs. RMDFXCSQAX vs. CSOIX

CIK vs. CSQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIK has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQAX's 1.74% expense ratio.

CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares
CIK
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund

Return for Risk

CIK vs. CSQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CIK
CIK Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIK Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
CSQAX
CSQAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CSQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CSQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIK vs. CSQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CIKCSQAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

-0.15

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

-0.15

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.98

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.24

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-0.39

-0.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIK vs. CSQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIK Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the CSQAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIK and CSQAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CIKCSQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

-0.15

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.46

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.49

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between CIK and CSQAX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CIK vs. CSQAX - Dividend Comparison

CIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than CSQAX's 1.08% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIK
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund		10.45%9.54%9.34%8.63%10.71%7.87%8.57%8.39%9.64%7.98%8.35%9.50%
CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares		1.08%1.09%6.54%2.73%2.59%9.06%13.23%4.77%1.84%5.27%1.87%0.24%

Drawdowns

CIK vs. CSQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIK drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than CSQAX's maximum drawdown of -8.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIK and CSQAX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CIKCSQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-8.37%

-46.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.49%

-5.05%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-7.28%

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-8.37%

-30.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.70%

-4.69%

-7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-2.07%

-11.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

3.16%

+1.84%

Volatility

CIK vs. CSQAX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that CIK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CIKCSQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

3.03%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

5.78%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

7.60%

+7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

6.33%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

5.98%

+11.30%