RSI.TO vs. ^TNX
RSI.TO (Rogers Sugar Inc.) is a stock, while ^TNX (Treasury Yield 10 Years) is an index. Over the past 10 years, RSI.TO returned 7.95%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for ^TNX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSI.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RSI.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI.TO achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RSI.TO has underperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.
RSI.TO
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
^TNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- 27.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
RSI.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 14.66% | 7.81% | 16.22% | 0.71% | 1.50% | 12.89% | 22.74% | -3.50% | -8.26% | -1.78% |
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years | 9.02% | -13.14% | 28.45% | -2.53% | 174.83% | 63.40% | -53.02% | -32.07% | 21.16% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI.TO and ^TNX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009 | 0.03 |
The correlation between RSI.TO and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (3 years) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank
RSI.TO
^TNX
RSI.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSI.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.06 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 0.36 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 0.73 | +7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSI.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.27 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.05 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
RSI.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -83.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI.TO and ^TNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.95% | -83.97% | +41.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -12.47% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -28.10% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | -28.10% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -83.93% | +49.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -9.63% | +8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -32.51% | +21.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 6.24% | -3.15% |
Volatility
RSI.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) is 3.10%, while Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that RSI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 5.21% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 11.59% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 17.01% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 33.36% | -17.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 48.25% | -29.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI.TO and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RSI.TO and ^TNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer