RSFYX vs. EIBLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSFYX (Victory Floating Rate Fund) and EIBLX (Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, RSFYX returned 4.84%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for EIBLX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSFYX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EIBLX.

Performance

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSFYX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than EIBLX's 0.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSFYX having a 4.84% annualized return and EIBLX not far behind at 4.68%.

RSFYX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 4.01%
• 1Y: 8.14%
• 3Y*: 8.30%
• 5Y*: 4.03%
• 10Y*: 4.84%

EIBLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 6.88%
• 5Y*: 4.85%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund	3.22%	7.09%	8.64%	7.48%	-6.82%	4.12%	4.96%	9.68%	0.69%	4.00%
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund	0.87%	3.90%	8.14%	12.29%	-2.34%	4.33%	2.38%	7.07%	0.81%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RSFYX and EIBLX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.65

The correlation between RSFYX and EIBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RSFYX vs. EIBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSFYX

RSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 86
RSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

EIBLX

EIBLX Risk / Return Rank: 43
EIBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EIBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
EIBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EIBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EIBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSFYX	EIBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.50	+0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.26	3.19	+2.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	1.48	+0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.00	2.02	+3.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.82	6.17	+13.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the EIBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSFYX and EIBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSFYX	EIBLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	1.50	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.13	1.76	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.15	1.33	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.27	-0.02

Drawdowns

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSFYX drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, smaller than the maximum EIBLX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSFYX and EIBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSFYX	EIBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.42%	-32.53%	+11.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.39%	-1.68%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.76%	-2.72%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.82%	-6.27%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.42%	-18.70%	-2.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-1.65%	+0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	0.55%	-0.13%

Volatility

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) is 0.54%, while Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) has a volatility of 0.58%. This indicates that RSFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSFYX	EIBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	0.58%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.24%	1.60%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00%	2.26%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.60%	2.77%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.23%	3.53%	+0.70%

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSFYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EIBLX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Dividend Comparison

RSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than EIBLX's 7.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund	7.03%	7.58%	8.29%	8.58%	5.02%	3.32%	3.68%	5.01%	4.46%	3.82%	4.14%	4.33%
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund	7.75%	9.39%	9.01%	8.22%	6.22%	4.16%	5.47%	6.07%	5.93%	5.07%	4.99%	5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSFYX and EIBLX in my portfolio?

RSFYX and EIBLX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSFYX or EIBLX?

EIBLX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to RSFYX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSFYX dropped -21.42% vs EIBLX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.