RSFYX vs. EIBLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX).
RSFYX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Dec 30, 2009. EIBLX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001.
Performance
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund | 1.59% | 7.09% | 8.64% | 7.48% | -6.82% | 4.12% | 4.96% | 9.68% | 0.69% | 4.00% |
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund | -1.32% | 3.90% | 8.14% | 12.29% | -2.34% | 4.33% | 2.38% | 7.07% | 0.81% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSFYX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than EIBLX's -1.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSFYX having a 5.01% annualized return and EIBLX not far behind at 4.78%.
RSFYX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
EIBLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSFYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EIBLX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RSFYX vs. EIBLX — Risk / Return Rank
RSFYX
EIBLX
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSFYX | EIBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 0.90 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 1.36 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.27 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.40 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.04 | 4.77 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSFYX | EIBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.90 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.68 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between RSFYX and EIBLX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Dividend Comparison
RSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than EIBLX's 6.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund | 8.04% | 9.39% | 9.01% | 8.22% | 6.22% | 4.16% | 5.47% | 6.07% | 5.93% | 5.07% | 4.99% | 5.31% |
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund | 6.86% | 7.58% | 8.29% | 8.58% | 5.02% | 3.32% | 3.68% | 5.01% | 4.46% | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.33% |
Drawdowns
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSFYX drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, smaller than the maximum EIBLX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSFYX and EIBLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSFYX | EIBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -32.53% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -1.95% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.82% | -6.27% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.42% | -18.70% | -2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.68% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -1.66% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.61% | +0.10% |
Volatility
RSFYX vs. EIBLX - Volatility Comparison
Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) at 0.55%. This indicates that RSFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RSFYX | EIBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 0.55% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 1.60% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 2.80% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 2.74% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.22% | 3.53% | +0.69% |