PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIBLX vs. FLYRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) and Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIBLX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than FLYRX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EIBLX has outperformed FLYRX with an annualized return of 4.71%, while FLYRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return.


EIBLX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
4.71%

FLYRX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.36%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIBLX
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund
0.61%3.90%8.14%12.29%-2.34%4.33%2.38%7.07%0.81%4.48%
FLYRX
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund
1.58%4.90%6.94%8.31%-3.26%4.32%2.10%7.57%0.17%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EIBLX and FLYRX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007

0.65

The correlation between EIBLX and FLYRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIBLX vs. FLYRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIBLX
EIBLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EIBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EIBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FLYRX
FLYRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLYRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) and Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIBLXFLYRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.72

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

5.34

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

15.76

-9.84

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FLYRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIBLX and FLYRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIBLX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than FLYRX's maximum drawdown of -30.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIBLX and FLYRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIBLXFLYRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-30.67%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.68%

-0.94%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.72%

-2.05%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.27%

-6.61%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.70%

-19.05%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.17%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-1.98%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.32%

+0.23%

Volatility

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) and Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX) have volatilities of 0.62% and 0.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIBLXFLYRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.65%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

1.75%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28%

2.48%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

2.68%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

3.59%

-0.06%

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIBLX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIBLX vs. FLYRX - Dividend Comparison

EIBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than FLYRX's 7.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIBLX
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund
7.05%7.58%8.29%8.58%5.02%3.32%3.68%5.01%4.46%3.82%4.14%4.33%
FLYRX
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund
7.28%7.48%5.87%6.45%5.40%3.46%3.91%5.01%4.70%4.13%3.88%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIBLX and FLYRX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLYRX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to EIBLX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIBLX dropped -32.53% vs FLYRX's -30.67%.

FLYRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIBLX and FLYRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer