RSEGX vs. USSCX
RSEGX (Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund) and USSCX (USAA Science & Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - RSEGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Victory, while USSCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, RSEGX returned 9.57%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for USSCX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSEGX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USSCX.
Performance
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSEGX achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly higher than USSCX's 16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RSEGX has underperformed USSCX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while USSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
RSEGX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 22.04%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 35.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
USSCX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSEGX Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund | 22.04% | 0.88% | 11.08% | 19.80% | -37.08% | -11.57% | 37.83% | 37.94% | -9.31% | 36.88% |
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund | 16.76% | 17.93% | 30.58% | 34.01% | -41.76% | -3.45% | 60.62% | 37.84% | -4.34% | 36.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSEGX and USSCX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1997 | 0.87 |
The correlation between RSEGX and USSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSEGX vs. USSCX — Risk / Return Rank
RSEGX
USSCX
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund (RSEGX) and USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSEGX | USSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.85 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 6.24 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSEGX drawdown since its inception was -82.12%, roughly equal to the maximum USSCX drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEGX and USSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSEGX | USSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.12% | -79.48% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -18.19% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.72% | -28.82% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.82% | -52.07% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.89% | -52.70% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.31% | -5.55% | -12.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -30.99% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 5.39% | -1.33% |
Volatility
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund (RSEGX) is 8.00%, while USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) has a volatility of 10.07%. This indicates that RSEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSEGX | USSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 10.07% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.34% | 18.16% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.14% | 22.34% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 28.94% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 26.64% | -0.49% |
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSEGX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSEGX vs. USSCX - Dividend Comparison
RSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSEGX Victory RS Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.25% | 16.78% | 9.05% | 9.01% | 20.43% | 9.55% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund | 8.07% | 9.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.49% | 5.36% | 27.99% | 16.68% | 8.31% | 4.15% | 6.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSEGX and USSCX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USSCX has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to RSEGX (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEGX dropped -82.12% vs USSCX's -79.48%.
RSEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSEGX and USSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer