RSEE vs. VT
RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSEE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Rareview Funds, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. RSEE is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSEE returned 19.29%/yr vs 20.93%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSEE charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
RSEE vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return.
RSEE
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
RSEE vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | 15.92% | 20.54% | 18.54% | 10.21% | -1.61% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSEE and VT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RSEE and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSEE vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSEE
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
RSEE
VT
Financial Services
RSEE
VT
Industrials
RSEE
VT
Consumer Cyclical
RSEE
VT
Communication Services
RSEE
VT
Healthcare
RSEE
VT
Consumer Defensive
RSEE
VT
Basic Materials
RSEE
VT
Energy
RSEE
VT
Utilities
RSEE
VT
Real Estate
RSEE
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSEE vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
RSEE
VT
RSEE vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSEE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.04 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 13.53 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSEE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.31 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.44 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
RSEE vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSEE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.60% | -50.27% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -9.67% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.60% | -16.51% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.88% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -7.02% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.17% | +0.93% |
Volatility
RSEE vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSEE | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 3.83% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 10.17% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 12.70% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 16.05% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 17.23% | +1.77% |
RSEE vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSEE vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
RSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | 0.21% | 0.24% | 9.02% | 0.84% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, RSEE and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RSEE has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEE dropped -21.60% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 3-year performance, VT leads with 20.93% vs 19.29% for RSEE. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VT has performed better with a 20.93% return vs 19.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for RSEE.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.21% for RSEE.
RSEE is categorized as Long-Short, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for RSEE and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSEE and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer