PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSEE vs. LBAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSEE vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSEE vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RSEE
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
-4.66%20.54%18.54%10.21%-1.61%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
15.90%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%16.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEE achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than LBAY's 15.90% return.


RSEE

1D
2.50%
1M
-9.62%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
10Y*

LBAY

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
15.90%
6M
14.05%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSEE vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSEE vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEE
RSEE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEE vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSEELBAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.75

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

1.20

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.44

3.16

+2.28

RSEE vs. LBAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEE Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the LBAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEE and LBAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSEELBAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.75

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.73

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between RSEE and LBAY is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RSEE vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison

RSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than LBAY's 3.40% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
RSEE
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
0.25%0.24%9.02%0.84%1.97%0.00%0.00%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.40%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%

Drawdowns

RSEE vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and LBAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSEELBAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-15.99%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.97%

-9.71%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.71%

-2.73%

-7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-6.77%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

4.18%

-0.71%

Volatility

RSEE vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 5.55%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSEELBAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

5.55%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

12.16%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.46%

16.19%

+7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

13.49%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

13.66%

+5.29%