RSEE vs. HTUS
RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSEE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Rareview, while HTUS is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSEE returned 14.53%/yr vs 19.29%/yr for HTUS. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSEE charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
RSEE vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSEE having a 10.69% return and HTUS slightly higher at 10.86%.
RSEE
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.44%
HTUS
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $530.02K | $526.22K | $608.25K | |
| $298.76K | $233.55K | $305.55K |
RSEE vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | 10.69% | 20.54% | 18.54% | 10.21% | -2.49% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.86% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSEE and HTUS is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RSEE and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSEE vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
RSEE
HTUS
RSEE vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSEE | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.43 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 11.54 | -4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSEE vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSEE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEE and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSEE | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.60% | -47.50% | +25.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -8.68% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.60% | -24.41% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -0.97% | -4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -4.02% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.83% | +1.60% |
Volatility
RSEE vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 3.04%. This indicates that RSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSEE | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 3.04% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 10.24% | +5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 12.28% | +7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 19.09% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.50% | -2.30% |
RSEE vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSEE has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSEE vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
RSEE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.73% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.24% | 9.02% | 0.84% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, RSEE and HTUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RSEE has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to HTUS (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEE dropped -21.60% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 3-year performance, HTUS leads with 19.29% vs 14.53% for RSEE. On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTUS is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for RSEE.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.73%, compared with 0.00% for RSEE.
RSEE is categorized as Long-Short, while HTUS is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Rareview and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for RSEE and 0.96% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSEE and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer