RSBA vs. RSST

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST).

RSBA and RSST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSBA is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024. RSST is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Sep 5, 2023.

Performance

RSBA vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSBA vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF	-0.50%	7.73%	-0.04%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	-0.25%	19.91%	0.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBA achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than RSST's -0.25% return.

RSBA

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSST

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -7.88%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 29.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBA vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBA has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 1.04% expense ratio.

RSST

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

RSBA

Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF

Return for Risk

RSBA vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBA

RSBA Risk / Return Rank: 43
RSBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
RSBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RSBA Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RSBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RSBA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 64
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBA vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSBA	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.05	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	1.47	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.22	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.59	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	6.49	-2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSBA vs. RSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the RSST Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBA and RSST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSBA	RSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	1.05	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.62	+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between RSBA and RSST is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RSBA vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

RSBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than RSST's 1.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF	3.39%	3.37%	0.01%	0.00%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	1.13%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%

Drawdowns

RSBA vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBA and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBA	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-30.80%	+27.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-19.03%	+16.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-9.04%	+7.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-6.34%	+5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	4.67%	-3.64%

Volatility

RSBA vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) is 2.18%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that RSBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSBA	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	7.30%	-5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	18.48%	-15.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	28.17%	-22.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.18%	24.71%	-19.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.18%	24.71%	-19.53%