PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSBT vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSBT vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBT achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


RSBT

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.56%
YTD
10.49%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBT vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
10.49%10.31%-2.90%-11.91%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%27.13%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBT and YCS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023

-0.09

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RSBT and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSBT vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBT vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSBTYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.92

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.44

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

3.97

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

12.40

-0.15

RSBT vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBT and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSBTYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.92

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.33

-0.24

Drawdowns

RSBT vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBT drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBT and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSBTYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-49.56%

+25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.33%

-8.30%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-23.05%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-19.93%

+7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.66%

-0.30%

Volatility

RSBT vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that RSBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSBTYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

2.75%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

12.32%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

17.27%

-3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

21.10%

-7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.68%

19.01%

-5.33%

RSBT vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSBT vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
2.90%3.20%0.00%2.38%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSBT and YCS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBT has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBT dropped -23.60% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 19.84% vs 4.98% for RSBT. On fees, RSBT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 19.84% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSBT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

RSBT is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RSBT and 1.00% for YCS.

RSBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSBT and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer